ADHD-first design, shipped across 3 specs and a public repo

A binding, portfolio-wide UX constraint set (eight numbered rules) explicitly framed around ADHD and dyslexia as disabilities rather than preferences, applied and checked against at least three separate shipped design specs, plus a public, actively maintained open-source memory/orchestration toolkit (jitneuro) whose stated purpose -- external, durable memory across sessions -- mirrors the same design principle applied to an AI agent's own working memory. Owner steer, verbatim (2026-08-24): "I think neuro adhd should be a primary card because most of what we do is designed around adhd since it is something I suffer from and list it as my biggest super power." Most technology leaders evaluate accessibility and cognitive-load design as a checklist bolted on after a product ships -- a compliance pass, not a design constraint that shaped the architecture from the first decision. A buyer or executive evaluator assessing AI-engineering judgment needs a way to tell the difference between "accessibility was reviewed" and "accessibility was the generative constraint that produced better decisions for every user, not just the one it was written for." Evidence: the rule file itself (internal, binding, authored and dated), three shipped design specs that cite it section-by-section against a real feature, and the public jitneuro repository.

Technologies

• Binding UX constraint set (8 rules)
• Cross-spec design-review enforcement
• jitneuro (public, open-source durable-memory toolkit)

Applicability

Useful for a technical or executive evaluator assessing ADHD-first design, shipped across 3 specs and a public repo specifically; drawn from internal source evidence, not an independently public-published artifact.

Evidence

Evidence class: owner-attested