Precision measurement: full census of 176 candidates, 2 defects fixed

A full-census (not sampled) precision measurement by independent judges, refusing to compare a stricter new figure to a stale, easier one.

A full-census (not sampled) precision measurement by independent judges, refusing to compare a stricter new figure to a stale, easier one.

A full-census (not sampled) precision measurement by independent judges, plus two real extraction defects found and fixed with regression tests observed failing before the fix. An earlier precision figure (87.5%) was computed under a looser standard than a later one (45.5%), and the two were at risk of being compared as if they meant the same thing. Evidence: PRECISION-POST-6510.md, which grades all 176 candidates individually against a stated standard.

Technologies

  • Full-census grading
  • Independent judge panel
  • Regression-tested defect correction

Applicability

Useful for a technical or executive evaluator assessing Precision measurement specifically; drawn from internal source evidence, not an independently public-published artifact.

Evidence

Evidence class: demonstrated-capability

Frequently asked

What is the evidence behind "Precision measurement: full census of 176 candidates, 2 defects fixed"?

PRECISION-POST-6510.md, which grades all 176 candidates individually against a stated standard.

Disagree with this record or have corrected evidence? Email coaching@jitaitoolbox.com -- replies typically land within five working days.

← All proof records · Hire Dan →